Kidd v. State

298 S.W.3d 598, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1781, 2009 WL 4783914
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2009·No. WD 70285·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Rickey Kidd appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kidd v. State, 298 S.W.3d 598, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1781, 2009 WL 4783914 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

298 S.W.3d 598 (Kidd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McAlester v. State
298 S.W.3d 598 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)