Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 602 F.3d 1306
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided May 9, 2012·No. 2011-1446·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MBO LABORATORIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BECTON, DICKINSON & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2011-1446 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 03-CV-10038, Judge Richard G. Stearns. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN M. SKENYON, Fish & Richardson, P.C. of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

LISA J. PIROZZOLO, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant- appellee. With her on the brief was WILLIAM G. MCELWAIN, of Washington, DC. Of counsel were ALEXANDRA C. BOUDREAU and JOHN C. POLLEY, of Boston, Massachusetts. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, DYK and Prost, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co. (Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.