Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.

Federal Circuit

Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMay 9, 2012

Docket2011-1446

StatusUnpublished

This text of Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co. (Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mbo Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MBO LABORATORIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BECTON, DICKINSON & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2011-1446 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 03-CV-10038, Judge Richard G. Stearns. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN M. SKENYON, Fish & Richardson, P.C. of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

LISA J. PIROZZOLO, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant- appellee. With her on the brief was WILLIAM G. MCELWAIN, of Washington, DC. Of counsel were ALEXANDRA C. BOUDREAU and JOHN C. POLLEY, of Boston, Massachusetts. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, DYK and Prost, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI