MBC Ventures, LLC v. Randall

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 8, 2018
DocketCUMcv-18-347
StatusUnpublished

This text of MBC Ventures, LLC v. Randall (MBC Ventures, LLC v. Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MBC Ventures, LLC v. Randall, (Me. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-18-347 ./ MBC VENTURES, LLC,

Plaintiff

v. ORDER

ROGER RANDALL, d/b/a RI RANDALL & SONS, ROGER RANDALL, and BONNIE RANDALL,

Defendants REC'D GUMB CLERKS OF1 JAN 9 '19 PH2:03 Before the court is defendants Roger Randall and Bonnie Randall's motion for leave to file

late answer. Pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 12(a), a defendant "shall serve that defendant's answer

within 20 days after the service of summons and complaint upon that defendant." M.R. Civ. P

12(a). Plaintiff served defendants on August 14, 2018. Plaintiff filed its request for default and

default judgment on November 1, 2018. Defendants Roger Randall and Bonnie Randall filed their

answer on November 6, 2018. Roger Randall d/b/a RI Randall & Sons was not listed as a party in

the answer.

"When a party moves to enlarge time to answer after the deadline to answer has passed,

that party must show that the failure to act was a result of 'excusable neglect.'" Dyer Goodal l &

Federle. LLC v. Proctor, 2007 ME 145,, 17,935 A.2d 1123; M.R. Civ. P. 6(b)(2). "Excusable

neglect will be found only when there are extraordinary circumstances that work an injustice. In

this analysis, self-represented parties are subject to the same standards as represented parties, and

they are not excused from complying with procedural rules." Dyer, 2007 ME 145,, 18,935 A.2d

1123 (citations omitted). (

In their motion for leave to file late answer, defendants state that "[d]efendants were prose

and understood neither their legal rights, nor their obligations." (Mot. for Leave to File Late Ans .

, 1.) Defendants state further they were communicating with plaintiff's counsel. (Id. , 3.)

Defendants have not shown excusable neglect. See Cutler v. Downeast Mo1tg. Corp., 2009 ME

84, j 15, 976 A.2d 929 ("financial constraints and inexperience with the judicial system" do not

constitute go9d cause); Dyer, 2007 ME 145,, 21, 935 A.2d 1123 (no evidence of extraordinary

circumstances).

The entry is

Defendants Roger Randall and Bonnie Ran all's Motion for Leave to File Late Answer is DENIED.

Date: January 8, 2018 ancy Mills Justice, Superior Court

. •.. ·~· ·~~f. oI - ( ·o Entered on the Docket: I - I

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dyer Goodall and Federle, LLC v. Proctor
2007 ME 145 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2007)
Downeast Mortgage Corp. v. Cutler
2009 ME 84 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MBC Ventures, LLC v. Randall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mbc-ventures-llc-v-randall-mesuperct-2018.