Mazarakis v. Mazarakis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mazarakis v. Mazarakis

39 A.D.3d 758, 832 N.Y.S.2d 445

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 A.D.3d 758 (Mazarakis v. Mazarakis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mazarakis v. Mazarakis, 39 A.D.3d 758, 832 N.Y.S.2d 445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J.), dated March 24, 2006, as, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination in an order dated February 7, 2006, sustaining the mother’s objection to that portion of an order of the same court (Fields-Ferraro, S.M.), dated December 14, 2005, which, inter alia, dismissed her petition seeking contribution from the father for the daughter’s college expenses.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order dated March 24, 2006, was [759]*759superseded by an order of disposition, dated September 8, 2006, and entered upon consent of the parties, from which no appeal lies (see Matter of Khan v Dolly, 302 AD2d 596 [2003]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J.), dated March 24, 2006, as, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination in an order dated February 7, 2006, sustaining the mother’s objection to that portion of an order of the same court (Fields-Ferraro, S.M.), dated December 14, 2005, which, inter alia, dismissed her petition seeking contribution from the father for the daughter’s college expenses.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order dated March 24, 2006, was [759]*759superseded by an order of disposition, dated September 8, 2006, and entered upon consent of the parties, from which no appeal lies (see Matter of Khan v Dolly, 302 AD2d 596 [2003]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.3d 758, 832 N.Y.S.2d 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mazarakis-v-mazarakis-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack