Khan v. Dolly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Khan v. Dolly

302 A.D.2d 596, 755 N.Y.S.2d 637

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J.), dated April 4, 2001, which, inter alia, denied her application for custody of the parties’ child.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order appealed from was superseded by an order of the same court, dated February 7, 2002, entered on consent of the parties, from which no appeal lies (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Brouwer v Pacicca, 291 AD2d 448, 449 [2002]; Matter of Garcia v Carballo, 277 AD2d 453 [2000]; Matter of Chiakpo v Obi, 255 AD2d 579, 580 [1998]). Florio, J.P., Crane, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J.), dated April 4, 2001, which, inter alia, denied her application for custody of the parties’ child.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order appealed from was superseded by an order of the same court, dated February 7, 2002, entered on consent of the parties, from which no appeal lies (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Brouwer v Pacicca, 291 AD2d 448, 449 [2002]; Matter of Garcia v Carballo, 277 AD2d 453 [2000]; Matter of Chiakpo v Obi, 255 AD2d 579, 580 [1998]). Florio, J.P., Crane, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Khan v. Dolly, 302 A.D.2d 596, 755 N.Y.S.2d 637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

302 A.D.2d 596 (Khan v. Dolly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related