Mays v. Joseph

District Court, S.D. Georgia·Decided March 5, 2021·No. 1:19-cv-00215·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS, ) Plaintiff, v. CV 119-215 WARDEN EVAN JOSPEH, Defendants.

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed, except as provided below. (doc. nos. 33, 35, 37, 38). The Court declines to adopt the recommendation to allow Plaintiff's individual capacity claim for nominal damages against Warden Joseph under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(a). (See doc. no. 30, pp. 6-8, 10.) RLUIPA does not create a private action for money damages against officials sued in their individual capacities. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-2(a); see also Smith v. Allen, 502 F.3d 1255, 1275 (11th Cir. 2007), abrogated on other grounds, Sossamon v. Texas, 563 U.S. 277 (2011). Although not addressed in the Report and Recommendation, the Court dismisses Plaintiffs official and individual capacity claims for injunctive relief under RLUIPA against

Warden Joseph because Plaintiff was transferred from Richmond County Correctional Institute to Calhoun State Prison. See McKinnon v. Talladega Cty., 745 F.2d 1360, 1363 (11th Cir. 1984) (holding general rule is prisoner’s transfer to new prison moots claims for injunctive relief); Davila v. Marshall, 649 F. App'x 977, 979-80 (11th Cir. 2016) (citing Spears v. Thigpen, 846 F.2d 1327, 1328 (11th Cir. 1988)) (same). In sum, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as modified herein, as its opinion, GRANTS Warden Joseph’s motion to dismiss, (doc. no. 23), DISMISSES Plaintiff's monetary claims for compensatory, punitive, and nominal damages against Warden Joseph in both his individual and official capacity, DISMISSES Plaintiff's RLUIPA claim for injunctive relief as moot, and DISMISSES Plaintiff's claim for First Amendment Free Exercise violations. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter an appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case. SO ORDERED this tay of March, 2021, at Augusta, Georgia.

| J. RAN + HALY, CHIEF JUDGE \UNITED/STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mays v. Joseph, (S.D. Ga. 2021).

Mays v. Joseph (Mays v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Allen
502 F.3d 1255 (Eleventh Circuit, 2007)
Anthony Davila v. Sheriff Logan Marshall
649 F. App'x 977 (Eleventh Circuit, 2016)
Sossamon v. Texas
179 L. Ed. 2d 700 (Supreme Court, 2011)