Mayock v. Superintendent, Norwich State Hospital
This text of 224 A.2d 544 (Mayock v. Superintendent, Norwich State Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application for a writ of habeas corpus is defective because it fails to state any basis for a claim of illegal confinement. Practice Book § 451. It also ignores the requirements of Practice Book § 452. If the objective of the plaintiff is to obtain an adjudication that his present mental condition does not require his confinement, he is entitled to be heard on that issue. But if he chooses habeas corpus rather than other available remedies, his application must set forth specific grounds for the issuance of the writ.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 A.2d 544, 154 Conn. 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayock-v-superintendent-norwich-state-hospital-conn-1966.