Maynard v. State
525 So. 2d 1022, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1336, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2258, 1988 WL 54539
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 1988
DocketNo. 86-2698
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 525 So. 2d 1022 (Maynard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maynard v. State, 525 So. 2d 1022, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1336, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2258, 1988 WL 54539 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
At sentencing, the trial court withheld adjudication of guilty and placed appellant under two years of probation. However, appellant was adjudicated guilty in the written judgment. A court’s written order must conform to oral pronouncement. We [1023]*1023remand for correction of the written judgment. Otherwise, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hargrove v. State
609 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
525 So. 2d 1022, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1336, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2258, 1988 WL 54539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maynard-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.