Hargrove v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hargrove v. State

609 So. 2d 177, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12588, 1992 WL 372251

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 16, 1992

DocketNo. 91-02041

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 609 So. 2d 177 (Hargrove v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hargrove v. State, 609 So. 2d 177, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12588, 1992 WL 372251 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Belton Hargrove’s judgment and sentence. We remand for correction of the written judgment.

As to count one of the information, the trial court orally adjudicated Hargrove guilty of possession of methamphetamine, a third-degree felony, which was consistent with the jury verdict. However, the written judgment reflects that Hargrove was adjudicated guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to sell, a second-degree felony. Although the parties did not raise this issue, we remand this case to the trial court for correction of the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Maynard v. State, 525 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Belton Hargrove’s judgment and sentence. We remand for correction of the written judgment.

As to count one of the information, the trial court orally adjudicated Hargrove guilty of possession of methamphetamine, a third-degree felony, which was consistent with the jury verdict. However, the written judgment reflects that Hargrove was adjudicated guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to sell, a second-degree felony. Although the parties did not raise this issue, we remand this case to the trial court for correction of the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Maynard v. State, 525 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

609 So. 2d 177, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12588, 1992 WL 372251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hargrove-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack