Mayes, Larry v. City of Hammond

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 2008
Docket06-3328
StatusUnpublished

This text of Mayes, Larry v. City of Hammond (Mayes, Larry v. City of Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mayes, Larry v. City of Hammond, (7th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued September 27, 2007 Decided August 28, 2008

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Nos. 06‐3328, 06‐3488 & 06‐3563

LARRY MAYES, Appeals from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellee, Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Cross‐Appellant, Hammond Division.

v. No. 03 C 379

CITY OF HAMMOND and MICHAEL Paul R. Cherry, SOLAN, Magistrate Judge. Defendants‐Appellants,

and

RAYMOND MYSZAK and FRANK DUPEY, Defendants, Cross‐Appellees.

O R D E R These consolidated appeals were argued on September 27, 2007. Nearly six months later we granted the parties’ motion to stay proceedings pending the outcome of their Nos. 06‐3328, 06‐3488 & 06‐3563 Page 2

settlement efforts. On June 26, 2008, the parties filed a joint motion to vacate the underlying jury verdict and judgment as a condition to the proposed settlement agreement they had reached. We issued a limited remand to the district court to allow the court to inform us if it was inclined to vacate the jury verdict and judgment. See U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, 513 U.S. 18 (1994); Marseilles Hydro Power LLC v. Marseilles Land & Water Co., 481 F.3d 1002 (7th Cir. 2007). In response the district court issued an Opinion and Order on August 15, 2008, advising us that it is inclined to grant the joint request to vacate the jury verdict and judgment. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mayes, Larry v. City of Hammond, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayes-larry-v-city-of-hammond-ca7-2008.