Maycene v. State

723 So. 2d 394, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 192, 1999 WL 9802
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 13, 1999
DocketNo. 98-1472
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 723 So. 2d 394 (Maycene v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maycene v. State, 723 So. 2d 394, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 192, 1999 WL 9802 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying defendant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 motion. Defendant is entitled to recalculation of his sentencing guidelines scoresheet because the scoresheet does not reflect any supporting calculations for the scored prior-offenses points, Williams v. State, 658 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), and there is no documentation attached to the scoresheet supporting the assessed points. Compare Dowdy v. State, 700 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). This cause is remanded to the trial court for further consideration of the motion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
826 So. 2d 1001 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
723 So. 2d 394, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 192, 1999 WL 9802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maycene-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.