Mayberry v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
75 Mo. 492
Opinion
The evidence adduced had no tendency to show authority on the part of Dr. Webber to bind defendant to pay for the boarding and nursing of Fleming, or any other of the items in plaintiff’s account. He certainly had no special authority to that effect, and his general authority only extended to contracts for medicines and things of that nature. Therefore, judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mayberry v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad, 75 Mo. 492 (Mo. 1882).
75 Mo. 492 (Mayberry v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Electric Household Stores, Inc. v. Hostetter
89 S.W.2d 28 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1935)
McDonald v. New York Central Railroad
199 N.W. 375 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1924)
Reynolds v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
90 S.W. 100 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Evans v. Marion Mining Co.
75 S.W. 178 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. Mylott
33 N.E. 135 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Hoover
13 S.W. 1092 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1890)
Diel v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
37 Mo. App. 454 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1889)
Bushnell v. Chicago & Northwestern R'y Co.
29 N.W. 753 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1886)
Griffin v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.
22 Mo. App. 621 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
C. & C. S. R. v. Wiseman
1 Ohio Cir. Dec. 134 (Hamilton Circuit Court, 1885)
Columbia & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. Wiseman
1 Ohio C.C. 246 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1885)
Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McMurray
98 Ind. 358 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McVay
98 Ind. 391 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)