May v. State

976 S.W.2d 597, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1653, 1998 WL 610886
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in May v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 445
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 1998·No. No. 73904·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George May, Movant, filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following his guilty plea to first degree sodomy in violation of section 566.062, RSMo 1994, and rape of a child in violation of section 566.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.1993. The motion court denied the motion without a hearing. Movant appeals this judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

May v. State, 976 S.W.2d 597, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1653, 1998 WL 610886 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

976 S.W.2d 597 (May v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.