May v. State
926 S.W.2d 724, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1414, 1996 WL 453429
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in May v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 445 →
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. In his Rule 24.035 motion, defendant alleges his trial counsel failed to present certain testimony from certain witnesses at his sentencing hearing. The motion court denied his motion without a hearing. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
May v. State, 926 S.W.2d 724, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1414, 1996 WL 453429 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).
926 S.W.2d 724 (May v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.