May v. State

792 So. 2d 584, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11087, 2001 WL 883310
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in May v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 721 So. 2d 741
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 2001·No. No. 4D01-2811·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to re-file at the conclusion of appellant’s pending appeal. See Daniels v. State, 712 So.2d 765 (Fla.1998)(holding that during pendency of defendant’s direct appeal trial court is without jurisdiction to rule on motion for post-conviction relief).

POLEN, C.J., DELL and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

May v. State, 792 So. 2d 584, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11087, 2001 WL 883310 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

792 So. 2d 584 (May v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
712 So. 2d 765 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)