May v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

May v. State

731 So. 2d 167, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5709, 1999 WL 270421

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 5, 1999

DocketNo. 98-1931

StatusPublished

This text of 731 So. 2d 167 (May v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

May v. State, 731 So. 2d 167, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5709, 1999 WL 270421 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

FARMER, J.

We affirm appellant’s conviction. As to appellant’s sentence for the misdemeanor charge of resisting an officer without violence, we remand to the trial court for correction of the written sentence to conform to the trial court’s oral pronounce[168]*168ment. See Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608, 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

GUNTHER, J„ and HOLMES, ILONA M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARMER, J.

We affirm appellant’s conviction. As to appellant’s sentence for the misdemeanor charge of resisting an officer without violence, we remand to the trial court for correction of the written sentence to conform to the trial court’s oral pronounce[168]*168ment. See Tannihill v. State, 559 So.2d 608, 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

GUNTHER, J„ and HOLMES, ILONA M., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

731 So. 2d 167, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5709, 1999 WL 270421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack