May v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

May v. Commonwealth

293 S.W.2d 728

DecidedSeptember 21, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 293 S.W.2d 728 (May v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

May v. Commonwealth, 293 S.W.2d 728 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roberta May was convicted on a second offense for illegal possession of intoxi-eating liquor in local option territory. The punishment imposed was 120 days in jail and a fine of $100. She has moved for an appeal and seeks reversal of the judgment.

The record and briefs have been read and examined. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the charge. No error has been found.

The motion, therefore, is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Roberta May was convicted on a second offense for illegal possession of intoxi-eating liquor in local option territory. The punishment imposed was 120 days in jail and a fine of $100. She has moved for an appeal and seeks reversal of the judgment.

The record and briefs have been read and examined. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the charge. No error has been found.

The motion, therefore, is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 S.W.2d 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1956.