May v. Commonwealth
This text of 264 S.W.2d 75 (May v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the Lawrence Circuit Court for a second offense of transporting intoxicating liquor in local option territory for the purpose of sale, and fixing the punishment at a.fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for 60 days. The sole ground for reversal is appellant insists he was entitled to an affirmative instruction to the effect that if he was transporting the whiskey for his personal use he should be acquitted.
The record shows the court instructed that before the jury could convict appellant it must believe -beyond a reasonable doubt he was transporting the whiskey for the purpose of sale. The instruction is couched in such language that an ordinary man who sits on a jury can easily understand, and its negative (raised by the usual reasonable doubt instruction) completely covers the defense of the accused; in which event we have held it is not necessary to give an affirmative instruction. Reynolds v. Com., Ky., 257 S.W.2d 514; Blevins v. Com., Ky., 258 S.W.2d 501.
Finding no error in the record, the judg-. ment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 S.W.2d 75, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1954.