Maxwell v. Board of Commrs. of Wildwood
174 A. 709, 113 N.J.L. 404, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 379
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellob, Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Case, Bodies, Donges, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maxwell v. Board of Commrs. of Wildwood, 174 A. 709, 113 N.J.L. 404, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 379 (N.J. 1934).
174 A. 709 (Maxwell v. Board of Commrs. of Wildwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roe v. Borough of Upper Saddle River
765 A.2d 779 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
Viviani v. Borough of Bogota
765 A.2d 1064 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
City of Newark v. Massey
225 A.2d 723 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Dobbs v. Pierce
183 A.2d 774 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)