Max Bova Neely v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 23, 2020
Docket05-19-01323-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Max Bova Neely v. State (Max Bova Neely v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Max Bova Neely v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

AFFIRM and Opinion Filed October 23, 2020

In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01322-CR No. 05-19-01323-CR

MAX BOVA NEELY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F19-55234-U, F19-55235-U

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Browning Opinion by Justice Carlyle Max Bova Neely entered guilty pleas to aggravated robbery and possession of

a firearm by a felon. TEX. PENAL CODE §§ 29.03, 46.04. He also entered true pleas

to two enhancements that increased the applicable sentencing range. Id. § 12.42(d).

The trial court accepted his pleas, found him guilty, and sentenced him to concurrent

terms of forty years’ confinement.

Mr. Neely contends the trial court erred by violating his common law right to

allocution and by giving him a grossly disproportionate sentence. But Mr. Neely did

not raise these issues in the trial court through a timely request, objection, or motion, and thus did not preserve them for our review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1(a)(1);

Rhoades v. State, 934 S.W.2d 113, 120 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); McClintick v. State,

508 S.W.2d 616, 618 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Bell v. State, 326 S.W.3d 716, 724

(Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, pet. dism’d). We affirm.

/Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 191322F.U05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

MAX BOVA NEELY, Appellant On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-19-01322-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F19-55234-U. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Molberg and Browning participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered this 23rd day of October, 2020.

–3– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

MAX BOVA NEELY, Appellant On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-19-01323-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F19-55235-U. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Molberg and Browning participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

–4–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhoades v. State
934 S.W.2d 113 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Bell v. State
326 S.W.3d 716 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)
McClintick v. State
508 S.W.2d 616 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Max Bova Neely v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/max-bova-neely-v-state-texapp-2020.