Mausner v. Mausner

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 7, 2024
Docket1:24-cv-01453
StatusUnknown

This text of Mausner v. Mausner (Mausner v. Mausner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mausner v. Mausner, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : IAN O. MAUSNER, : : Plaintiff, : : 24-CV-1453 (JMF) -v- : : MEMORANDUM OPINION IRENA K. MAUSNER et al., : AND ORDER : Defendants. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, paid the fees to commence this action, in which he invokes the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction based on federal question and diversity of citizenship. See ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”), at 2. STANDARD OF REVIEW The Court has the authority to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim, even when the plaintiff has paid the fees to bring an action, “so long as the plaintiff is given notice and an opportunity to be heard.” Wachtler v. County of Herkimer, 35 F.3d 77, 82 (2d Cir. 1994) (internal quotation marks omitted). The Court is obliged, however, to construe pro se pleadings liberally, Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009), and interpret them to raise the “strongest [claims] that they suggest,” Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). DISCUSSION A. Leave to Replead as to David Allinson Plaintiff names David Allinson as a Defendant in the caption of the Complaint, see Compl. at 1, but the Complaint itself does not contain any allegations against David Allinson that would show why he has been named as a Defendant. See Dove v. Fordham Univ., 56 F. Supp. 2d 330, 335 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) (“[W]here the complaint names a defendant in the caption but contains no allegations indicating how the defendant violated the law or injured the plaintiff, a motion to dismiss the complaint in regard to that defendant should be granted.” (citations omitted)); Iwachiw v. New York State Dep’t of Motor Vehicles, 299 F. Supp. 2d 117, 121 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) (dismissing claims against the governor because the “only mention of his name is in the caption of the amended complaint”).

The Court therefore dismisses Plaintiff’s claims against David Allinson, but grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint, should he wish to do so, that sets forth facts suggesting that David Allinson should be held liable for what Plaintiff alleges occurred. B. Service on Irena K. Mausner and Nicole Allinson The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses as to Defendants Irena K. Mausner and Nicole Allinson. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of a summons and Complaint on each of those Defendants within 90 days of the issuance of the summonses.1 If within those 90 days, Plaintiff has not either served those Defendants or requested an extension of time to do so, the Court may dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against those Defendants under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute.

CONCLUSION The Court dismisses Plaintiff’s claims against David Allinson for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, but grants Plaintiff 30 days’ leave to replead those claims in an

1 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, the summonses in this action were not issued when Plaintiff filed the Complaint because he had not paid the required fees at the time of filing, but did so subsequently. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date the summonses are issued. amended complaint. An amended complaint form is attached to this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to: (1) issue summonses for Irena K. Mausner and Nicole Allinson; (2) mail both a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order and an information package to Plaintiff; and (3) terminate David Allinson as a Defendant. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 7, 2024 heGe— New York, New York ESSE RMAN nited States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Civ. (i)

(In the space above enter the full name(s) of the plaintiff(s).) AMENDED COMPLAINT -against- Jury Trial: O Yes oO No ee (check one)

(dn the space above enter the full name(s) of the defendant(s). Ifyou cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed in the above caption must be identical to those contained in Part I. Addresses should not be included here.)

I. Parties in this complaint: A. List your name, address and telephone number. If you are presently in custody, include your identification number and the name and address of your current place of confinement. Do the same for any additional plaintiffs named. Attach additional sheets of paper as necessary. Plaintiff Name Street Address ee County, City. State& ZipCode Telephone Number eee B. List all defendants. You should state the full name of the defendant, even if that defendant is a government agency, an organization, a corporation, or an individual. Include the address where each defendant may be served. Make sure that the defendant(s) listed below are identical to those contained in the above caption. Attach additional sheets of paper as necessary.

Rev. 12/2009

Street Address _______________________________________________________ County, City _________________________________________________________ State & Zip Code ____________________________________________________ Telephone Number ____________________________________________________ Defendant No. 2 Name ___________________________________________________________ Street Address _______________________________________________________ County, City _________________________________________________________ State & Zip Code ____________________________________________________ Telephone Number ____________________________________________________ Defendant No. 3 Name ___________________________________________________________ Street Address _______________________________________________________ County, City _________________________________________________________ State & Zip Code ____________________________________________________ Telephone Number ____________________________________________________ Defendant No. 4 Name ___________________________________________________________ Street Address _______________________________________________________ County, City _________________________________________________________ State & Zip Code ____________________________________________________ Telephone Number ____________________________________________________ II. Basis for Jurisdiction: Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Only two types of cases can be heard in federal court: cases involving a federal question and cases involving diversity of citizenship of the parties. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, a case involving the United States Constitution or federal laws or treaties is a federal question case. Under 28 U.S.C. §

Related

Harris v. Mills
572 F.3d 66 (Second Circuit, 2009)
Dove v. Fordham University
56 F. Supp. 2d 330 (S.D. New York, 1999)
Iwachiw v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
299 F. Supp. 2d 117 (E.D. New York, 2004)
Wachtler v. County of Herkimer
35 F.3d 77 (Second Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mausner v. Mausner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mausner-v-mausner-nysd-2024.