Maurice Dewayne Brown v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 19, 2018
DocketA19A0756
StatusPublished

This text of Maurice Dewayne Brown v. State (Maurice Dewayne Brown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maurice Dewayne Brown v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 13, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0756. MAURICE DEWAYNE BROWN v. THE STATE.

Charged with possession of methamphetamine, possession of marijuana, and obstruction of an officer, Maurice Dewayne Brown filed a motion to suppress the drugs found on him. At the subsequent hearing, the trial court denied the motion, but no order was entered.1 Thereafter, Brown filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied on March 16, 2018. Brown obtained a certificate of immediate review on March 23, and filed a notice of appeal on March 29, 2018. We lack jurisdiction over this direct appeal. An order denying a motion to suppress is not a final appealable decision within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a). Moreover, the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not itself directly appealable, and the filing of such a motion does not extend the time for filing an appeal. See Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 510- 511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000); Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271, 271-272 (326 SE2d 5) (1985); see also Mayor & Aldermen of City of Savannah v. Norman J. Bass Const. Co., 264 Ga. 16, 17 (1) (441 SE2d 63) (1994) (holding that an order denying a motion for reconsideration “can be the subject of an application for interlocutory appeal”). Accordingly, Brown was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure outlined in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) by obtaining a certificate of immediate

1 An oral order is not appealable unless it is reduced to writing, signed by the judge, and filed with the clerk. OCGA § 5-6-31; Boynton v. Reeves, 226 Ga. 202, 202-203 (173 SE2d 702) (1970); Sharp v. State, 183 Ga. App. 641, 642 (1) (360 SE2d 50) (1987). review from the trial court within ten days and filing a timely application for interlocutory review in this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Court of Appeals Rule 30. Although Brown obtained a certificate of immediate review, his failure to apply for and obtain an order from this Court granting him the right to file a direct appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction. For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/13/2018 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boynton v. Reeves
173 S.E.2d 702 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
Sharp v. State
360 S.E.2d 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Bell v. Cohran
536 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Mayor of Savannah v. Norman J. Bass Construction Co.
441 S.E.2d 63 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)
Savage v. Newsome
326 S.E.2d 5 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Maurice Dewayne Brown v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maurice-dewayne-brown-v-state-gactapp-2018.