Matyas v. State

663 So. 2d 671, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12107, 1995 WL 681288
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1995·No. No. 95-03159·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sandy Matyas appeals the- summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his properly sworn motion and memorandum, Matyas claimed his trial counsel was ineffective for several reasons. Because the trial court denied the motion without explanation or attachments, we are unable to review the merits of this appeal. Therefore, we reverse and remand this cause for the trial court to either again deny the motion and attach to its order those portions of the record which demonstrate that Matyas is not entitled to relief or con[672] duct an evidentiary hearing to determine the merits of Matyas’ claims.

Reversed and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matyas v. State, 663 So. 2d 671, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12107, 1995 WL 681288 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

663 So. 2d 671 (Matyas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hillman v. State
663 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)