Hillman v. State

663 So. 2d 671, 1995 WL 642978
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1995·No. 95-00381·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

663 So.2d 671 (1995)

Walter F. HILLMAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-00381.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 3, 1995.

Samuel J. Williams of Williams & Williams, New Port Richey, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

BLUE, Judge.

Walter F. Hillman appeals his judgment and sentence following his violation of probation. We agree with Hillman that the trial court erred by failing to conduct a Nelson[1] inquiry when considering Hillman's request to discharge his public defender. However, it is clear that the error was harmless. See Kott v. State, 518 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Because the trial court failed to enter an order specifying which conditions of probation Hillman was found to have violated, we remand for the entry of a written order. See Batten v. State, 589 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Affirmed, but remanded.

FRANK, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.

NOTES

[1] Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hillman v. State, 663 So. 2d 671, 1995 WL 642978 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

663 So. 2d 671 (Hillman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
779 So. 2d 395 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Ingram v. State
754 So. 2d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Williams v. State
731 So. 2d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Reyes v. State
711 So. 2d 1378 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Lundy v. State
700 So. 2d 790 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)