Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.
349 N.W.2d 605, 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3228
Opinion
[606] OPINION
Continental Insurance Company argues that, since the legislature has repealed the underinsured motorist coverage section of the No-Fault Act, they are free to exclude stacking of benefits. In Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co., 349 N.W.2d 345 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), this court held that the repeal did not change the nature of underinsured motorist coverage and, therefore, attempted “anti-stacking” exclusions, such as the one in this case, are void.
DECISION
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co., 349 N.W.2d 605, 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3228 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984).
349 N.W.2d 605 (Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.
371 N.W.2d 203 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1985)