Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.

349 N.W.2d 605, 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3228

CourtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota

DecidedJune 19, 1984

DocketNo. C2-84-512

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 349 N.W.2d 605 (Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co., 349 N.W.2d 605, 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3228 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

[606]*606OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Continental Insurance Company argues that, since the legislature has repealed the underinsured motorist coverage section of the No-Fault Act, they are free to exclude stacking of benefits. In Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co., 349 N.W.2d 345 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), this court held that the repeal did not change the nature of underinsured motorist coverage and, therefore, attempted “anti-stacking” exclusions, such as the one in this case, are void.

DECISION

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI