Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.
This text of 361 N.W.2d 30 (Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Continental Insurance Company for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. Briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel are advised that a petition for further review in Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co., 349 N.W.2d 345, has been granted and that oral argument will be had in that representative case; those wishing to participate in that argument may seek permission from this court and shall, by agreement of all counsel, share the one hour authorized for the full argument. Any agreement shall accompany the application to participate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 N.W.2d 30, 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattson-v-continental-insurance-co-minn-1985.