Mattle Gay v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
This text of 199 F.2d 370 (Mattle Gay v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
199 F.2d 370
Mattle GAY, as Administratrix of the goods, chattels and
credits of John Joseph Krause, deceased, and Erva Lorraine
Hill, widow of said deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Royal Indemnity Company, Intervener-Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 6, Docket 22349.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 10, 1952.
Decided Oct. 29, 1952.
Jacob Rassner, New York City, Robert Klonsky and Irving Frank, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff-appellant.
Sutta & Frankel, New York City, Nathan Frankel and Frank Reiter, New York City, on the brief, for intervener-plaintiff-appellant.
Conboy, Hewitt, O'Brien & Boardman, New York City, Edward F. Butler, New York City, of counsel, for appellee.
Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co. v. Dillon, 1 W.W.Harr. 247, 31 Del. 247, 114 A. 62, 15 A.L.R. 894, and Jones v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 5 Terry 486, 44 Del. 486, 61 A.2d 691.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 F.2d 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattle-gay-v-pennsylvania-railroad-company-ca2-1952.