Mattison v. State

145 So. 921, 25 Ala. App. 657
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 1933·No. 7 Div. 963.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

It adds nothing to the value of the body of our law to discuss the testimony in every case involving the claimed illegal possession of prohibited liquor. ’

The circumstances showing, or sufficient to show, or failing, to show, to the requi'i'e'd' degree, such possession, are myriad; Almost every case has a little circumstance all its own.

• Suffice here to say that wé h'ave carefully 'examined the whole evidence; sitting'en bane.

The same is, in our opinion, and;‘w'e hold, entirely insufficient, -"under tlié'-' established rules of review, to sustain the verdict of the jury and the judgment of conviction rendered thereon.

*658 For the error in overruling appellant’s motion to set same aside, etc., said judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. See our cases of Gilbert v. State, ante, p. 169, 142 So. 682; Allen v. State, 21 Ala. App. 23, 104 So. 867; and Guilford v. State, 20 Ala. App. 625, 104 So. 678.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mattison v. State, 145 So. 921, 25 Ala. App. 657 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

145 So. 921 (Mattison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. State
104 So. 867 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Guilford v. State
104 So. 678 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)