Allen v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Allen v. State

104 So. 918, 20 Ala. App. 670

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 1925

Docket2 Div. 345.

StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 918 (Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. State, 104 So. 918, 20 Ala. App. 670 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of having in his possession a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors, and appeals. The case presents no question involving other than the most elementary principles of law. We have examined each exception reserved, and are of the opinion that no prejudicial error was committed in any of the rulings complained of. The case was properly submitted to the jury under full and accurate instructions as to the law. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of having in his possession a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors, and appeals. The case presents no question involving other than the most elementary principles of law. We have examined each exception reserved, and are of the opinion that no prejudicial error was committed in any of the rulings complained of. The case was properly submitted to the jury under full and accurate instructions as to the law. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 So. 918, 20 Ala. App. 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-state-alactapp-1925.