Mattingly v. Justice
Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARGURIETE MATTINGLY, Case No. 24-cv-03061-EMC
8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S NOTICE 9 v.
10 HILLARY CARLVIN JUSTICE, Docket No. 30 11 Defendant.
12 13 14 Defendant has filed a document titled “Notice with leave to set aside attach[ed] Order for 15 good cause, Title 28 USC § 455.” The attached order is the Court’s corrected order denying 16 Defendant’s motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”). 17 To the extent Defendant is contesting the Court’s ruling denying him the right to proceed 18 on appeal IFP, he must seek relief with the Ninth Circuit, not this Court. See Fed. R. App. P. 19 24(a)(5) (providing that “[a] party may file a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the 20 court of appeals within 30 days after service of the notice prescribed in Rule 24(a)(4) [where a 21 district court denies a motion to proceed on appeal IFP]”). 22 It is not clear from the content of Defendant’s filing whether he seeks any other relief, in 23 particular, from this Court. However, to the extent Defendant suggests that this Court should have 24 been or should be disqualified from adjudicating matters in his case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455 25 (providing that a judge “shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might 26 reasonably be questioned” as well as in certain specified circumstances), the Court finds no basis 27 for that position. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555-56 (1994) (noting that “judicial 1 formed by the judge on the basis of facts introduced or events occurring in the course of the 2 || current proceedings, or of prior proceedings, do not constitute a basis for a bias or partiality 3 motion unless they display a deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment 4 || impossible”). 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: September 3, 2024 9 10 EDWAR EN I United States District Judge 12
© 15 16
= 17
Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mattingly v. Justice (Mattingly v. Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.