Mattie Moon v. United Group Enterprises, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 2013
DocketA13A1707
StatusPublished

This text of Mattie Moon v. United Group Enterprises, LLC (Mattie Moon v. United Group Enterprises, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mattie Moon v. United Group Enterprises, LLC, (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ June 12, 2013

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A13A1707. MATTIE MOON v. UNITED GROUP ENTERPRISES, LLC.

Mattie Moon filed this tort action against United Group Enterprises, LLC and Georgia Power Company, Inc. In an order entered on February 4, 2013, the trial court granted United Group Enterprises’s motion to dismiss. At that point, Georgia Power Company remained as a defendant in the case.1 On March 1, 2013, Moon filed a notice of appeal indicating her wish to appeal “the judgment of the trial court entered on the 1st day of February, 2013.” 2 We, however, lack jurisdiction. “In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment.” (Punctuation omitted.) Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d 731) (1989). Thus, the February 4 order was not a final judgment because it disposed of only one defendant, leaving the other defendant remaining in the case. To appeal the February 4 order, Orr had to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). We note that the trial court dismissed Georgia Power Company by order entered March 21, 2013. That dismissal, however, does not vest this Court with jurisdiction. “Where the notice of appeal specifies that the appeal is taken from an order which is not appealable and where the appeal is in fact taken from such an

1 Georgia Power Company filed a motion to dismiss on February 12, 2013. 2 Because there was no order entered on February 1, we assume Moon was referring to the order entered on February 4, which was the only order the trial court had entered at that point. order, the appeal is subject to dismissal.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Richardson v. General Motors Corp., 221 Ga. App. 583 (472 SE2d 143) (1996). Here, the notice of appeal indicated that Moon sought to appeal the February 4 order, which was not a final, directly appealable order. The subsequent entry of the order dismissing Georgia Power does not alter this result because the appeal was interlocutory when Moon filed her notice of appeal. See Richardson, supra. Because Moon failed to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 06/12/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Hospital Corporation of America
385 S.E.2d 731 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Richardson v. General Motors Corp.
472 S.E.2d 143 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mattie Moon v. United Group Enterprises, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattie-moon-v-united-group-enterprises-llc-gactapp-2013.