Matthews v. Zane
This text of 8 U.S. 382 (Matthews v. Zane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court at first hesitated as to the jurisdiction, but upon consultation together and deliberation—
declared it to be the opinion of a majority of the judges, that this court has jurisdiction. That the third article of the constitution of the United States, when considered in connection with the statute, will give it a more extensive construction than it might otherwise receive. It is supposed, that the act intends to give this court the power of rendering uniform the construction of the laws of the United States, and the decisions upon rights or titles, claimed under those laws.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 U.S. 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-zane-scotus-1808.