Matthews v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets Inc.
This text of 559 So. 2d 488 (Matthews v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mable Lee MATTHEWS
v.
SCHWEGMANN GIANT SUPERMARKETS INC.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
PER CURIAM.
The application is granted.
The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the party which prevailed in the trial court, established that the cans fell from the shelf in the supermarket without being touched by plaintiff and without any other customers in the area. This circumstantial evidence therefore established that the condition of the shelf presented an unreasonable risk of harm which caused plaintiff's injury. Defendant therefore had the burden to prove that it did not create the hazard and that its employees exercised the degree of care which would lead to discovery of most hazards. Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 452 So.2d 685 (La.1984). Defendant failed to carry that burden.
*489 The judgment of the court of appeal, 555 So.2d 671, is set aside, and the judgment of the district court is reinstated.
MARCUS, J., concurs in the result being of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court was not clearly wrong.
WATSON, J., joins the opinion and also believes that the trial court was not clearly wrong.
COLE, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
559 So. 2d 488, 1990 La. LEXIS 956, 1990 WL 44198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthews-v-schwegmann-giant-supermarkets-inc-la-1990.