Matthews v. Pemberton
3 N.J.L. 429
Opinion
OH CERTIORARI.
This was an action founded on the act to prevent the waste of timber. The state of demand was for $100, for thirteen penalties, which at eight dollars each, would [f] make $104. The justice tried the cause without a jury, and rendered judgment for $40. The name of the town [23]*23where the land was situated was not named, or the land any way described.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matthews v. Pemberton, 3 N.J.L. 429 (N.J. 1808).
3 N.J.L. 429 (Matthews v. Pemberton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.