Matthews v. Pemberton

3 N.J.L. 428

Opinion

This was an action founded on the act to prevent the waste of timber. The state of demand was for glOO, for thirteen penalties, which at eight dollars each, would [#] make 8104. The justice tried the cause without a jury, and rendered judgment for $40. The name of the town where the land was situated was not named, or the land any way described. Judgment reversed,