Matthews v. Patterson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1609

PEARL B. MATTHEWS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CLYDE L. PATTERSON; GLADYS J. WOODALL; E. MARSHALL WOODALL; G. NORMAN ACKER, III; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:05-cv-00842-BO)

Submitted: November 15, 2007 Decided: November 20, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pearl B. Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Walter E. Brock, Jr., YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Pearl B. Matthews appeals the district court’s order

dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Matthews v. Patterson, No. 5:05-cv-00842-BO

(E.D.N.C. June 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -