Matthews v. Patterson

Fourth Circuit

Matthews v. Patterson

254 F. App'x 252

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 20, 2007·No. No. 07-1609·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pearl B. Matthews appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. Patterson, No. 5:05-cv-00842-BO (E.D.N.C. June 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Pearl B. Matthews appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. Patterson, No. 5:05-cv-00842-BO (E.D.N.C. June 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Matthews v. Patterson, 254 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

254 F. App'x 252 (Matthews v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.