Matthew Ebeling v. State
This text of Matthew Ebeling v. State (Matthew Ebeling v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIRD DIVISION MCFADDEN, C. J., DOYLE, P. J., and HODGES, J.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules
DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL FILINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN THE TIMES SET BY OUR COURT RULES.
June 10, 2020
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A20A1437. EBELING v. THE STATE.
MCFADDEN, Chief Judge.
A jury found Matthew Ebeling guilty of battery, false imprisonment, and
robbery, and judgment was entered against him in December 2013. We affirmed his
conviction in an unpublished opinion. See Ebeling v. State, ___ Ga. App. ___ (Case
No. A19A1168, decided September 16, 2019). After our remittitur issued to the
superior court, Ebeling filed a timely “Motion to Reduce/Modify Sentence.” The
superior court denied Ebeling’s motion, and he filed a timely application for
discretionary review of that order. We granted Ebeling’s application. But because
Ebeling’s notice of appeal was untimely, we lack jurisdiction and so must dismiss the
appeal. The proper and timely filing of the notice of appeal is an absolute requirement
to confer appellate jurisdiction upon this court. Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872
(1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995).
Ebeling is incarcerated. He filed a pro se application for discretionary review
with this Court. In our order granting his application, we noted that an order denying
a timely motion to reduce or modify a sentence under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f) is subject
to direct appeal and “[u]nder OCGA § 5-6-35 (j), this Court will grant a timely
discretionary application if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal.” As
required by the Appellate Practice Act, our February 5, 2020, order granting
Ebeling’s application directed him to file his notice of appeal within ten days. See
OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). Because February 17, 2020, was Washington’s Birthday, a
national holiday, Ebeling had until February 18, 2020 to file a timely notice of appeal.
See Court of Appeals Rule 3. But Ebeling’s notice of appeal was received and filed
on February 19, 2020. So the State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.
In his opposition to the motion, Ebeling asserts that he received the order
granting his application on February 10, 2020 and that he immediately requested and
was granted access to the prison law library. The record bears him out. It shows that
his notice of appeal is dated February 11, 2020, was accompanied by a cover letter
2 dated February 12, 2020, and was enclosed in an envelope that appears to have been
stamped by the post office on February 12, 2020. But the notice of appeal was
file-stamped by the Cherokee County Superior Court on February 19, 2020. So the
record establishes that, although Ebeling acted promptly after receiving our order, his
filing did not get to the superior court in time. So we have no jurisdiction over his
appeal.
We acknowledge that this is a harsh and unfair result. See Price v. Dozier, 348
Ga. App. 283, 283-284 (821 SE2d 566) (2018) (McFadden, P. J., concurring fully and
specially). It is a recurring problem. See id. It appears to arise, not from anyone’s
neglect or misconduct, but from ordinary delay in mail delivery and from necessary
security precautions in our correctional facilities.
Appeal dismissed. Doyle, P. J., and Hodges, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matthew Ebeling v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matthew-ebeling-v-state-gactapp-2020.