Mattes v. United States

79 F.2d 127, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4037
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 1935
DocketNo. 5615
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 79 F.2d 127 (Mattes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mattes v. United States, 79 F.2d 127, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4037 (3d Cir. 1935).

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The question involved in this case js the special defense of Mattes that he was called as a witness before the grand jury and claims to have been made immune from prosecution on that account.

We find no statute or other warrant for the position that, because Mattes was called and testified before the grand jury in an investigation concerning alleged election frauds, he was thereafter immune from prosecution in a case where he was charged with an offense against the election laws.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gilboy
160 F. Supp. 442 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1958)
Raymond A. Biggs v. United States
246 F.2d 40 (Sixth Circuit, 1957)
United States v. Johnson
76 F. Supp. 538 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1947)
Pulford v. United States
155 F.2d 944 (Sixth Circuit, 1946)
United States v. Levy
153 F.2d 995 (Third Circuit, 1946)
United States v. Burk
41 F. Supp. 916 (D. Delaware, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 F.2d 127, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mattes-v-united-states-ca3-1935.