MatterofBankvRacette

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 6, 2014
Docket518707
StatusPublished

This text of MatterofBankvRacette (MatterofBankvRacette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MatterofBankvRacette, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: November 6, 2014 518707 ________________________________

In the Matter of HERMAN BANK, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

STEVEN RACETTE, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Respondent. ________________________________

Calendar Date: September 16, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Herman Bank, Coxsackie, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed -2- 518707

as moot (see Matter of Howell v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1312, 1312 [2014]; Matter of Burroughs v Martuscello, 111 AD3d 1208, 1208 [2013]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, McCarthy, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burroughs v. Martuscello
111 A.D.3d 1208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Howell v. Fischer
116 A.D.3d 1312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MatterofBankvRacette, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matterofbankvracette-nyappdiv-2014.