Burroughs v. Martuscello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burroughs v. Martuscello

111 A.D.3d 1208, 975 N.Y.S.2d 703

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.3d 1208 (Burroughs v. Martuscello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burroughs v. Martuscello, 111 A.D.3d 1208, 975 N.Y.S.2d 703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Greene County) to review a determination by respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. As such, petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Lopez v Fischer, 102 AD3d 1025, 1025 [2013]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Spain, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Greene County) to review a determination by respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. As such, petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Lopez v Fischer, 102 AD3d 1025, 1025 [2013]).

Lahtinen, J.P., Spain, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.3d 1208, 975 N.Y.S.2d 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burroughs-v-martuscello-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack