MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Layton]

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Layton]

121 A.D.3d 1279, 993 N.Y.S.2d 641, 993 N.Y.S.2d 637

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 2014

DocketD-65-14

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.3d 1279 (MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Layton]) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MatterofAttorneysinViolationofJudiciaryLaw§468-a[Layton], 121 A.D.3d 1279, 993 N.Y.S.2d 641, 993 N.Y.S.2d 637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990, was suspended by this Court’s order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, EJ., Lahtinen, Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI