Matter of Villa Maria Inst. of Music

426 N.E.2d 466, 54 N.Y.2d 691, 442 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2628
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 6, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by36 cases

This text of 426 N.E.2d 466 (Matter of Villa Maria Inst. of Music) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Villa Maria Inst. of Music, 426 N.E.2d 466, 54 N.Y.2d 691, 442 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2628 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

There was substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that an employment relationship existed between the Villa Maria Institute of Music and the instructors. Whether an employment relationship exists necessarily is a question of fact, involving a determination of “the existence of a right of control over the agent in respect of the manner in which his work is to be done” (Matter of Morton, 284 NY 167,172; see Matter of Liberman v Gallman, 41 NY2d 774, 778). All aspects of the arrangement must lie examined to determine whether the degree of control and direction reserved to the employer establishes an employment relationship (Matter of Morton, 284 NY, at p 173, supra; Matter of Liberman v Gallman, 41 NY2d, at p 778, supra; cf. *693 Matter of Wittenstein v Fugazy Cont. Corp., 59 AD2d 249, mot for Iv to app den, 43 NY2d 648).

Contrary to petitioner’s argument, the record as a whole provides sufficient support for the board’s determination. While there was evidence from which a contrary conclusion could have been drawn, the board was not required to accept petitioner’s characterization of the instructors as independent contractors (see Matter of MNORX, Inc. [Ross], 46 NY2d 985, 986; Matter of Liberman v Gallman, supra, at p 779). The conclusion that evidence exists to sustain the determination ends the judicial inquiry (see Matter of Burger [Corsi], 303 NY 654, 656).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Dorsey (NY Go Express Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)
2021 NY Slip Op 04398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Murray (TN Couriers LLC--Commissioner of Labor)
2020 NY Slip Op 05269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Cowan (Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distrib., Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)
2018 NY Slip Op 2229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Yoga Vida NYC, Inc. v. Commissioner of Labor
64 N.E.3d 276 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
Voltaire v. Home Services Systems, Inc.
823 F. Supp. 2d 77 (E.D. New York, 2011)
Artis v. Random House, Inc.
34 Misc. 3d 858 (New York Supreme Court, 2011)
Tagare v. NYNEX Network Systems Co.
994 F. Supp. 149 (S.D. New York, 1997)
Bartle v. Mercado
235 A.D.2d 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Foley v. Mobil Chemical Co.
170 Misc. 2d 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)
In re the Claim of Mydland
221 A.D.2d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Dortz v. City of New York
904 F. Supp. 127 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Alie v. Nynex Corp.
158 F.R.D. 239 (E.D. New York, 1994)
Goyette v. DCA Advertising Inc.
830 F. Supp. 737 (S.D. New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Bakal
192 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Clorfeine
187 A.D.2d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Kearsh
186 A.D.2d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re Cameryn Entertainment Co. Inc.
174 A.D.2d 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Claim of Kelley
166 A.D.2d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
In re New York Philomusica Chamber Ensemble
165 A.D.2d 963 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
426 N.E.2d 466, 54 N.Y.2d 691, 442 N.Y.S.2d 972, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-villa-maria-inst-of-music-ny-1981.