MATTER OF TOMLINSON v. Ward
This text of 488 N.E.2d 114 (MATTER OF TOMLINSON v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (110 AD2d 537). We add only that the extension of the probationary period, under the circumstances of this case, is not a penalty as contemplated by Judiciary Law § 519.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 N.E.2d 114, 66 N.Y.2d 771, 497 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-tomlinson-v-ward-ny-1985.