Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF THOMPSON v. Wallace

MATTER OF THOMPSON v. Wallace

381 N.E.2d 164, 45 N.Y.2d 803, 409 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2229
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 1, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 381 N.E.2d 164 (MATTER OF THOMPSON v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF THOMPSON v. Wallace, 381 N.E.2d 164, 45 N.Y.2d 803, 409 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2229 (N.Y. 1978).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as petitioner is an objector to respondent’s designating petition, rather than the candidate against whose petition the objections were filed, petitioner’s failure to commence this proceeding to invalidate the designating petitions within the 14-day period (Election Law, § 16-102, subd 2) is fatal (compare Matter of Bruno v Peyser, 40 NY2d 827, 828, with Matter of Pell v Coveney, 37 NY2d 494). Petitioner’s assertion that he may avoid the 14-day statutory limitation because he is a candidate for the same office as respondent is untenable (see Matter of Pell v Coveney, supra). Since it was petitioner who objected to the designating petition, he was obligated to commence this proceeding within the statutory time period, irrespective of any determination by the Board of Elections.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Nowinski v. New York City Bd. of Elections
2018 NY Slip Op 5809 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Sirignano v. Sunderland
196 Misc. 2d 831 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Stoppenbach v. Goldstein
287 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Levy v. Nassau County Board of Elections
162 Misc. 2d 861 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)
Dwyer v. Barasch
176 A.D.2d 1067 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Bessinger v. Mahoney
153 A.D.2d 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Augustine v. D'Apice
153 A.D.2d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Zaretski v. Tutunjian
133 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Visconti v. Paino
137 Misc. 2d 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)
In re the Village of Herkimer Republican Party
119 Misc. 2d 801 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Crable v. Le Fever
84 A.D.2d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Blenman v. Herron
411 N.E.2d 786 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Schneeberg v. New York State Board of Elections
78 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 N.E.2d 164, 45 N.Y.2d 803, 409 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-thompson-v-wallace-ny-1978.