Blenman v. Herron
411 N.E.2d 786, 51 N.Y.2d 750, 432 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2615
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs. The exception carved out for candidates in Matter of Pell v Coveney (37 NY2d 494) does not apply to objectors (see Matter of Thompson v Wallace, 45 NY2d 803, 804).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Blenman v. Herron, 411 N.E.2d 786, 51 N.Y.2d 750, 432 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2615 (N.Y. 1980).
411 N.E.2d 786 (Blenman v. Herron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Riley v. Democratic Party
21 A.D.3d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Sirignano v. Sunderland
196 Misc. 2d 831 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Kerins v. Hinrichs
286 A.D.2d 458 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Krupczak v. Mancini
153 A.D.2d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Augustine v. D'Apice
153 A.D.2d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Visconti v. Paino
137 Misc. 2d 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)
In re the Village of Herkimer Republican Party
119 Misc. 2d 801 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)