Matter of Tantaros v. Marin
2021 NY Slip Op 00642
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 2021·No. Index No. 650476/18 Appeal No. 13060 Case No. 2020-03910·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Matter of Tantaros v Marin (2021 NY Slip Op 00642)
Decided and Entered: February 04, 2021
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Mendez, JJ.
Index No. 650476/18 Appeal No. 13060 Case No. 2020-03910
Jonathan Askin, Brooklyn and Fein & Del Valle, PLLC, Washington DC (Bruce Fein of the Bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for petitioner. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Saunders of counsel), for Hon. Alan C. Marin, respondent. Jay M. Wolman, New York and Hogan Duff, LLP, Long Island City (Anderson Duff of counsel), for Michael Krechmer, respondent.
| Matter of Tantaros v Marin |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 00642 |
| Decided on February 04, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered: February 04, 2021
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Mendez, JJ.
Index No. 650476/18 Appeal No. 13060 Case No. 2020-03910
[*1]In the Matter of Andrea K. Tantaros, Petitioner,
v
Hon. Alan C. Marin, et al., Respondents.
v
Hon. Alan C. Marin, et al., Respondents.
Jonathan Askin, Brooklyn and Fein & Del Valle, PLLC, Washington DC (Bruce Fein of the Bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for petitioner. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Saunders of counsel), for Hon. Alan C. Marin, respondent. Jay M. Wolman, New York and Hogan Duff, LLP, Long Island City (Anderson Duff of counsel), for Michael Krechmer, respondent.
The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,
Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,
It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: February 4, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Tantaros v. Marin, 2021 NY Slip Op 00642 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).
2021 NY Slip Op 00642 (Matter of Tantaros v. Marin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Tantaros v. Marin
2021 NY Slip Op 00642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)