Matter of Strong v. . Randall

69 N.E. 721, 177 N.Y. 400, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 948
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 1904·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Gv/riami.

While we are of opinion that proceedings taken under section 915 of the Code of Civil Procedure to punish a witness for contempt in failing to give testimony for use in actions or suits in other states constitute a special proceeding within the definition of the Code, we are also of opinion that the order from which the present appeal is taken, which merely directs the witness to answer specified questions, is interlocutory in its character. The final order in the proceeding will be that which either punishes or refuses to punish the witness for contempt, should he persist in his refusal to *401 testify, and it is such an order only that is appealable to this court, as a matter of right.

The appeal should he dismissed, with costs, and ten dollars costs of motion.

Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Strong v. . Randall, 69 N.E. 721, 177 N.Y. 400, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 948 (N.Y. 1904).

69 N.E. 721 (Matter of Strong v. . Randall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Long Island Trust Co. v. Rosenberg
82 A.D.2d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
In re Appeal of Pennsylvania Railroad
111 A.2d 509 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
In Re Pennsylvania R. Co.
111 A.2d 509 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
In re Williams
153 Misc. 682 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)
In re Gleichman
123 Misc. 198 (New York Supreme Court, 1924)
Guenther v. Ridgway Co.
159 A.D. 74 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Matter of Steinman v. . Conlon
101 N.E. 853 (New York Court of Appeals, 1913)
Matter of Besch
95 N.E. 697 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Lochren
143 F. 211 (Eighth Circuit, 1906)
State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Bland
88 S.W. 28 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)
Perry v. Rubber Tire Wheel Co.
138 F. 836 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1905)
Matter of King v. . Ashley
72 N.E. 106 (New York Court of Appeals, 1904)