Matter of Besch

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Besch

95 N.E. 697, 202 N.Y. 552, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 1106

New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

While we are of the opinion that the order sought to he reviewed was made without authority, we are also of the opinion that it is not a final order in a special proceeding and subject to appeal to this court, hut that its validity may be tested by the appellant when any attempt is made to punish him for failing to comply with the order. (Matter of Strong v. Randall, 177 N. Y. 400.) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed, but, under the circumstances, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.; Haight, J., concurs only in the dismissal of the appeal. Absent: Gray, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

While we are of the opinion that the order sought to he reviewed was made without authority, we are also of the opinion that it is not a final order in a special proceeding and subject to appeal to this court, hut that its validity may be tested by the appellant when any attempt is made to punish him for failing to comply with the order. (Matter of Strong v. Randall, 177 N. Y. 400.) The appeal, therefore, is dismissed, but, under the circumstances, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.; Haight, J., concurs only in the dismissal of the appeal. Absent: Gray, J.

Matter of Besch, 95 N.E. 697, 202 N.Y. 552, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 1106 (N.Y. 1911).

Pincite

95 N.E. 697 (Matter of Besch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related